The re-election of Donald Trump as President of the United States has raised significant concerns and speculation among global supply chain leaders. With his return to the White House, there are looming questions about how his policies might reshape global trade networks. Trump's past presidency was marked by tariff escalations and a strong protectionist stance, elements that could resurface and lead to major disruptions in international commerce.
Supply chain executives are particularly focused on the prospect of heightened tariffs and the far-reaching impacts such measures could bring. If Trump's previous campaign promises hold true—with proposals for substantial tariffs of 60-100% on Chinese imports and 10-20% on all other imports—businesses engaged in cross-border trade may face a turbulent landscape. Such policies could dramatically elevate the cost of imported goods, affecting manufacturers, retailers, and ultimately consumers who may bear the brunt of rising prices.
As Trump considers appointments for his cabinet, procurement and supply chain professionals are watching closely, bracing for the implications that his administration’s potential policies could have on freight rates, trade agreements, and operational expenses. The next chapter of U.S. leadership may well redefine the economic strategies that businesses rely on, reshaping supply chain dynamics for years to come.
Trade Policy Focus
A second Trump term would likely place trade at the forefront, using unilateral measures and tariffs as key policy tools. Trump’s emphasis on the U.S. trade balance suggests heightened scrutiny of bilateral trade deficits and potential actions to address them.
Trump’s campaign promises raise questions about their impact on global supply chains. The U.S. cannot domestically replace all imports, especially with unemployment at 4% and reduced immigrant labour for industries like apparel.
Trump’s plan to tax all imports, particularly from China, could escalate tariffs and enforce ‘Buy American’ policies. Retailers might initially stockpile inventory but would face choices between higher import costs or passing these to consumers, risking profit margins.
Moving production to Vietnam or Bangladesh could help but the scope is very limited, as Vietnam’s manufacturing output is only 10% of China’s capacity.
ESG and Operational Shifts
ESG regulations may see rollbacks, though major corporations may uphold practices to meet consumer, investor, and international standards. Companies should prepare for nearshoring or onshoring, considering changing 'Made in USA' thresholds and potential exclusions of key trade partners like China.
Supply Chain Resilience
Supply chain resilience will depend on swift strategy adaptations to new tariffs, trade deals, and market changes. Proposed tariffs could transform manufacturing, coinciding with potential industrial action and strained logistics. East Coast ports may face labour disruptions in early 2025, intensifying challenges.
Small manufacturers could struggle with transition costs, while larger firms might use this opportunity to redesign supply chain networks for flexibility.
Potential International Reactions from the EU
Trump’s proposed tariffs could trigger opposition and retaliation from trading partners, including allies like the EU. The European Commission has outlined plans for potential countermeasures, including targeted tariffs on U.S. exports to pressure the administration into negotiations rather than a drawn-out escalation. The EU is also coordinating with partners like Australia, Japan, and South Korea for a unified response.
U.S. companies exporting to regions like China and the EU must consider both the direct impact of higher U.S. tariffs and the possible retaliatory measures that could affect their operations and market access.
U.S. Import Dynamics and Supplier Considerations
- The U.S. is the largest importer of goods globally, with $3.2 trillion in imports in 2022, a 14.6% increase from 2021.
- China remains the top supplier, making up 16.5% of total imports, with items like smartphones, automation systems, toys, and video game consoles.
- Other major suppliers include:
- Mexico: $454.8 billion
- Canada: $436.6 billion
- Japan: $148.1 billion
- Germany: $146.6 billion
- EU (27 member states): $553.3 billion in total imports
- Proposed tariffs of up to 60% on Chinese goods could drive businesses to reconsider supply chain locations.
- Limited supplier options might initially increase costs until alternative sources can scale up, given long timelines for investment and production ramp-up.
Freight Rates
- Broad tariffs could impact the shipping industry by reducing import volumes, which may slow down freight activity at ports and drive down rates.
- Rates may spike due to stockpiling ahead of policy changes.
- A potential new tariff hike, from 25% to up to 100%, could further incentivize front-loading, especially with ongoing disruptions in the Red Sea adding additional pressure on supply chains.
This scenario may lead to heightened freight costs and logistical bottlenecks heading into 2025.
North American Trade and the 2026 USMCA Review
-
USMCA Overview:
- Replaced NAFTA in July 2020, governing North American trade.
- Includes a “sunset” clause (Article 34.7) for automatic termination after 16 years unless renewed.
- The first review is set for July 2026 to determine whether to extend the Agreement for another 16 years.
-
Review Process:
- Work starts in 2025; public notice and consultations begin by October 2025 in the U.S.
- Stakeholder input and congressional consultations are mandated before formal review.
-
Key Issues for Review:
- Automotive Trade: Differing views on North American content calculation; U.S. concerns about Chinese investments in the Mexican auto sector.
- Agricultural Disputes: Ongoing issues such as dairy, corn, and global lumber trade.
- Energy and Digital Policies: Mexico’s energy policies and Canada’s digital service taxes.
- Labour Mechanism: Potential reforms to the Rapid Response Labor Mechanism (RRM).
- Climate Measures: Canada’s interest in emissions-related trade measures.
-
Broader Considerations:
- Non-trade issues like immigration and security could influence the review.
Industry Impacts
Tariffs on foreign trade—particularly from China—could create significant challenges for many U.S. industries that rely on overseas manufacturing. If Trump follows through on his campaign promises, there will likely be new tariffs on Chinese imports. The proposal to levy 10% on all foreign imports remains sceptical, however, highlighting the gap between campaign rhetoric and actual policy.
Manufacturers outside of China are not panicking just yet, but uncertainty remains a serious concern for the global supply chain. This period of ambiguity underscores the importance of preparedness.
Other International Trade Initiatives and Agreements
While a Trump administration is expected to favour unilateral measures and show less deference to allied opposition, Trump—known for his self-styled dealmaking—may still seek to negotiate trade agreements, leveraging tariffs as a key tool.
During his first term, Trump’s administration actively pursued new and revised trade deals, reshaping existing frameworks to align with his economic policies. However, certain ongoing initiatives launched under the Biden administration may face curtailment or cancellation.
- The first Trump administration concluded significant trade agreements, including:
- The USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement)
- Renegotiated aspects of the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement
- Phase I Agreement with China
- Initiated trade negotiations with the United Kingdom and Kenya
- Potential discontinuation or abandonment of current initiatives:
- The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), which Trump has labeled as “TPP Two,” referencing his 2017 withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
- The future of the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC) remains uncertain under Trump’s administration.
- Multilateral institutions and climate policies:
- Earlier threats to withdraw from institutions such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), would require congressional approval.
- Strong resistance is expected toward international regulations assessing climate and social impacts on supply chains, such as:
- The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)
- The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)
- Potential responses to climate-focused trade measures:
- The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), set for implementation in 2026, could face aggressive opposition if deemed disadvantageous to U.S. businesses.
Conclusion
Navigating the shifting dynamics of the global lumber market requires businesses to stay informed and proactive in managing risks, particularly regarding trade retaliation that may impact export capabilities. As the industry faces transformative years from 2023-2025, leveraging accurate data and insights is essential for success.
This volatility, however, is a strong competitive advantage by the Timber Exchange. With the Market Data Hub and intuitive trade tools, the platform assists the industry players in making data-driven decisions while the whole process unlocks the true potential for performance optimisation and sustainable growth within such a fast-changing environment.
To learn more about such news, subscribe to our newsletter today.