Disclaimer: The information provided on the Timber Exchange Market Data Hub is sourced from a variety of publicly available data sources and confidential sources that have not been independently verified. Timber Exchange is not responsible for any expenses, damages, losses, or costs incurred as a result of using or relying on the information provided on this site. By using the Timber Exchange Market Data Hub, you agree to use the information at your own risk and acknowledge that any decisions made based on the information provided are done so solely at your own risk.
Australia and EU clash over EUDR maps in deforestation dispute

Australia and EU clash over EUDR maps in deforestation dispute

Posted on August 1, 2024   |  

The Australian government, along with the new Agriculture Minister, is in dispute with the EU over the EUDR, claiming the EU is using incorrect maps to assess deforestation.

Australia, joined by Brazil, Canada, and Columbia, argues that the EU should use the 2023 Forests of Australia Map instead of the 2020 EU Observation on Deforestation and Forest Degradation, which defines forested areas differently.

The core issue is whether the EUDR will adopt Australia’s forest map or the EU’s version with different criteria.

Australia’s concerns are echoed by 20 European Agricultural Ministers and officials from countries like China, the US, and New Zealand, who have also requested a delay in implementing the EUDR.

The EU has yet to guide on complying with the EUDR, and many EU member states have not assigned authorities to oversee imports.

Australian producers are advocating for a delay in the EUDR rollout to ensure they have enough time to understand and meet the new requirements, considering shipping deadlines.

Compliance costs for the EUDR could soar to $2.5 billion, placing a heavy burden on global forest producers.

The EU anticipates that these costs will be absorbed by businesses along the value chain, potentially reducing profits and increasing prices for consumers.



Previous Next