At Centersource Technologies AB we are committed to the highest standards of ethical research and data integrity, guided by the ESOMAR Code of Conduct. Our data is sourced from a limited, anonymous market survey conducted with trusted and established industry participants. The insights derived from this survey reflect aggregated finalized prices as well as observed prices reported within the participants respective markets, with a focus on the highest prices recorded during the first two weeks of each month. These insights are provided for informational purposes only and are intended to indicate market trends rather than serve as comprehensive or fully representative market data.
In adherence to ESOMAR's principles, we ensure that all data collection and analysis are conducted with transparency, respect for confidentiality, and strict compliance with ethical guidelines:
- Data Sourcing and Methodology:
We exclusively use data from government, customs, or government-affiliated websites to maintain reliability and public integrity. In addition, we engage directly with industry experts to gather real-time, firsthand information. Each data point is collected, verified, and aggregated following established ethical standards, ensuring that our research processes meet the rigor recommended by ESOMAR. - Transparency and Accuracy:
All data are published promptly as they become available from the source, ensuring that our insights remain current and reflective of on-ground market dynamics. We actively seek and incorporate regular feedback from industry experts, which allows us to make real-time adjustments and continuously improve the accuracy and reliability of our data. - Ethical Data Usage and Third-Party Material:
Our adherence to the ESOMAR Code of Conduct underscores our commitment to ethical research practices. We maintain strict controls over data sharing and usage; copying or distributing our data is prohibited under our company policy. Furthermore, all necessary agreements are in place for any third-party material used, ensuring full compliance with copyright laws and industry best practices. - Limitation of Liability:
While we strive to provide high-quality, timely market insights, the data is derived from a limited sample and should be interpreted within that context. We are not liable for any damages arising from the use of this data, as it is provided solely for informational purposes and as a directional indicator of market trends.
By integrating ESOMAR's ethical guidelines into our research methodology, we ensure that our practices are transparent, respectful of data confidentiality, and aligned with internationally recognized standards. This commitment not only reinforces the credibility of our insights but also builds trust with our stakeholders and industry partners.
Australia and EU clash over EUDR maps in deforestation dispute
Posted on August 1, 2024 |
The Australian government, along with the new Agriculture Minister, is in dispute with the EU over the EUDR, claiming the EU is using incorrect maps to assess deforestation.
Australia, joined by Brazil, Canada, and Columbia, argues that the EU should use the 2023 Forests of Australia Map instead of the 2020 EU Observation on Deforestation and Forest Degradation, which defines forested areas differently.
The core issue is whether the EUDR will adopt Australia’s forest map or the EU’s version with different criteria.
Australia’s concerns are echoed by 20 European Agricultural Ministers and officials from countries like China, the US, and New Zealand, who have also requested a delay in implementing the EUDR.
The EU has yet to guide on complying with the EUDR, and many EU member states have not assigned authorities to oversee imports.
Australian producers are advocating for a delay in the EUDR rollout to ensure they have enough time to understand and meet the new requirements, considering shipping deadlines.
Compliance costs for the EUDR could soar to $2.5 billion, placing a heavy burden on global forest producers.
The EU anticipates that these costs will be absorbed by businesses along the value chain, potentially reducing profits and increasing prices for consumers.