At Centersource Technologies AB we are committed to the highest standards of ethical research and data integrity, guided by the ESOMAR Code of Conduct. Our data is sourced from a limited, anonymous market survey conducted with trusted and established industry participants. The insights derived from this survey reflect aggregated finalized prices as well as observed prices reported within the participants respective markets, with a focus on the highest prices recorded during the first two weeks of each month. These insights are provided for informational purposes only and are intended to indicate market trends rather than serve as comprehensive or fully representative market data.
In adherence to ESOMAR's principles, we ensure that all data collection and analysis are conducted with transparency, respect for confidentiality, and strict compliance with ethical guidelines:
- Data Sourcing and Methodology:
We exclusively use data from government, customs, or government-affiliated websites to maintain reliability and public integrity. In addition, we engage directly with industry experts to gather real-time, firsthand information. Each data point is collected, verified, and aggregated following established ethical standards, ensuring that our research processes meet the rigor recommended by ESOMAR. - Transparency and Accuracy:
All data are published promptly as they become available from the source, ensuring that our insights remain current and reflective of on-ground market dynamics. We actively seek and incorporate regular feedback from industry experts, which allows us to make real-time adjustments and continuously improve the accuracy and reliability of our data. - Ethical Data Usage and Third-Party Material:
Our adherence to the ESOMAR Code of Conduct underscores our commitment to ethical research practices. We maintain strict controls over data sharing and usage; copying or distributing our data is prohibited under our company policy. Furthermore, all necessary agreements are in place for any third-party material used, ensuring full compliance with copyright laws and industry best practices. - Limitation of Liability:
While we strive to provide high-quality, timely market insights, the data is derived from a limited sample and should be interpreted within that context. We are not liable for any damages arising from the use of this data, as it is provided solely for informational purposes and as a directional indicator of market trends.
By integrating ESOMAR's ethical guidelines into our research methodology, we ensure that our practices are transparent, respectful of data confidentiality, and aligned with internationally recognized standards. This commitment not only reinforces the credibility of our insights but also builds trust with our stakeholders and industry partners.
Ver.di Union Votes for Renegotiation Amid Unsatisfactory ZDS Proposals
Posted on September 4, 2024 |
Ver.di, the German trade union, has rejected a collective agreement proposal from the Central Association of German Seaport Operators (ZDS), signaling growing tensions in the ongoing negotiations. The union's decision reflects dissatisfaction with the terms offered and raises the prospect of potential strikes, which could disrupt operations across the country's seaports. This development marks a critical juncture in the negotiations, as both parties must now revisit the table to address the concerns of the workers and avert further escalation.
A new collective agreement was negotiated in the fourth round, last month (July ‘24) covering 11,500 workers at North Sea ports in Germany. The ZDS (the employers' association) presented two different options, each with varying timeframes. However, a recent survey of ver.di members revealed widespread dissatisfaction with both proposals, prompting employees to call for a renegotiation of the terms. The union emphasised that the offer was completely inadequate for both options.
Option 1 proposes a 12-month agreement that includes an inflation compensation bonus of €1,000, tax-free. Additionally, starting January 1, hourly wages would increase by €0.95, shift bonuses would rise, and an extra annual vacation allowance of €480 would be provided.
Option 2, with a 16-month duration, offers a higher compensation bonus for inflation of €1,400 and a larger increase in hourly wages of €1.15 starting January 1. Similar to Variant 1, it also includes increases in holiday pay and shift bonuses.
Maren Ulbrich, the negotiator for Ver.di, acknowledged that while the ZDS has made some progress by proposing real wage increases in their latest offers, these proposals still need to catch up to the substantial wage hikes and support that employees are seeking in a satisfactory agreement. Ulbrich emphasised that seaport workers labour diligently every day, playing a crucial role in ensuring the availability of essential goods for the population.
Ms. Ulbrich also warned that the initial proposals put forward during the negotiations were inadequate, leading to frustration among employees who are unwilling to accept such low offers. She also hinted at the possibility of additional warning strikes in the future. The expiration of the contract between ZDS and its employees earlier this year (2024) has already triggered periodic warning strikes at ports in Hamburg, Wilhelmshaven, Bremen, Bremerhaven, Emden, and Brake.
In light of the rejected proposals, Ver.di has called on the ZDS to return to the negotiating table with an improved offer that meets the expectations of the workers. As tensions rise and the threat of further strikes looms, the outcome of these renegotiations will be crucial in determining the future stability of operations at Germany's seaports. Both parties now face the challenge of reaching an agreement that balances the needs of the employees with the demands of the industry.