At Centersource Technologies AB we are committed to the highest standards of ethical research and data integrity, guided by the ESOMAR Code of Conduct. Our data is sourced from a limited, anonymous market survey conducted with trusted and established industry participants. The insights derived from this survey reflect aggregated finalized prices as well as observed prices reported within the participants respective markets, with a focus on the highest prices recorded during the first two weeks of each month. These insights are provided for informational purposes only and are intended to indicate market trends rather than serve as comprehensive or fully representative market data.

In adherence to ESOMAR's principles, we ensure that all data collection and analysis are conducted with transparency, respect for confidentiality, and strict compliance with ethical guidelines:

  • Data Sourcing and Methodology:
    We exclusively use data from government, customs, or government-affiliated websites to maintain reliability and public integrity. In addition, we engage directly with industry experts to gather real-time, firsthand information. Each data point is collected, verified, and aggregated following established ethical standards, ensuring that our research processes meet the rigor recommended by ESOMAR.
  • Transparency and Accuracy:
    All data are published promptly as they become available from the source, ensuring that our insights remain current and reflective of on-ground market dynamics. We actively seek and incorporate regular feedback from industry experts, which allows us to make real-time adjustments and continuously improve the accuracy and reliability of our data.
  • Ethical Data Usage and Third-Party Material:
    Our adherence to the ESOMAR Code of Conduct underscores our commitment to ethical research practices. We maintain strict controls over data sharing and usage; copying or distributing our data is prohibited under our company policy. Furthermore, all necessary agreements are in place for any third-party material used, ensuring full compliance with copyright laws and industry best practices.
  • Limitation of Liability:
    While we strive to provide high-quality, timely market insights, the data is derived from a limited sample and should be interpreted within that context. We are not liable for any damages arising from the use of this data, as it is provided solely for informational purposes and as a directional indicator of market trends.

By integrating ESOMAR's ethical guidelines into our research methodology, we ensure that our practices are transparent, respectful of data confidentiality, and aligned with internationally recognized standards. This commitment not only reinforces the credibility of our insights but also builds trust with our stakeholders and industry partners.

East Coast Port Strike Avoided as ILA and USMX Agree on 6-Year Contract

East Coast Port Strike Avoided as ILA and USMX Agree on 6-Year Contract

Posted on January 13, 2025   |  

The imminent port strike on the East and Gulf coasts is likely to be averted following a tentative six-year master contract agreement reached by the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The agreement, subject to ratification, will help stabilise port operations, potentially easing freight rate pressures.
 

Key Highlights of the Agreement:

  • Six-Year Framework:
    The tentative master contract spans six years and ensures job protection for ILA members. It also outlines a framework for technology adoption aimed at modernising port operations while creating additional jobs.
  • Operational Continuity:
    Both sides agreed to operate under the current contract until formal ratification by ILA's Wage Scale Committee and USMX members. This arrangement prevents any immediate work stoppage, previously expected on January 15, 2025.
  • Modernisation & Job Creation:
    The deal strikes a balance between technological advancements and job preservation, positioning East and Gulf Coast ports for safer, more efficient operations while expanding capacity to support global supply chains.
     

Freight Rate Outlook:

Analysts suggest the agreement may avert freight rate hikes that would have resulted from reduced container capacity due to potential strike disruptions.

  • Bernstein Report:
    According to investment bank Bernstein, the threat of a strike was a significant factor contributing to anticipated freight rate increases. With the agreement in place, rates may stabilise, barring other market pressures such as new tariffs on U.S. imports.
  • Impact of External Factors:
    Despite this positive development, ongoing geopolitical tensions, such as the Red Sea crisis, continue to influence freight rates. Analysts predict that resolution of these issues could result in a rapid decline in shipping costs.
     

Industry Reactions:

  • Tech as a Catalyst, Not a Threat:
    Judah Levine, Head of Research at Freightos, noted that this agreement frames technological integration as a means to create jobs rather than eliminate them. He described the deal as a temporary resolution in the ongoing debate over automation in ports.
  • Shippers’ Sentiment:
    While some shipping lines have already imposed strike-related surcharges, industry experts like Lars Jensen pointed out inconsistencies in their rationale, particularly with MSC’s identical surcharges for U.S. and Canadian routes. Jensen remarked that although costs for shippers may rise due to increased ILA wages, avoiding a prolonged strike justifies the expense.
     

Political Influence:

ILA President Harold Daggett credited former President Donald Trump for his role in facilitating the agreement. Daggett cited Trump’s direct involvement, including meetings and public support for the union, as pivotal in securing protections against automation for longshore workers.
 

Despite these positive developments, reports indicate lingering uncertainties, with previously agreed wage increases potentially being renegotiated in exchange for reduced automation. Both ILA and USMX stated they would refrain from disclosing further details until internal approvals are complete.
 

Conclusion:

The six-year agreement between ILA and USMX marks a significant step toward stabilising port operations and mitigating freight disruptions. While it represents a win for labour and industry stakeholders, future discussions on automation and wage structures will likely shape the long-term landscape of U.S. port operations.
 

In a Nutshell:

  1. Agreement Duration: Six years, subject to ratification.
  2. Immediate Impact: No strike on January 15, 2025; ongoing operations under current contract terms.
  3. Focus Areas: Job protection, technology integration, port modernisation.
  4. Freight Rate Implications: Potential stabilisation barring other geopolitical influences.
  5. Political Role: Former President Trump is credited with facilitating the agreement.
  6. Next Steps: Internal review and approval by ILA and USMX members before full disclosure.
     

For more updates, subscribe to our newsletter today. Also, explore our Market Data Hub with real-time insights and data-driven analysis.