At Centersource Technologies AB we are committed to the highest standards of ethical research and data integrity, guided by the ESOMAR Code of Conduct. Our data is sourced from a limited, anonymous market survey conducted with trusted and established industry participants. The insights derived from this survey reflect aggregated finalized prices as well as observed prices reported within the participants respective markets, with a focus on the highest prices recorded during the first two weeks of each month. These insights are provided for informational purposes only and are intended to indicate market trends rather than serve as comprehensive or fully representative market data.
In adherence to ESOMAR's principles, we ensure that all data collection and analysis are conducted with transparency, respect for confidentiality, and strict compliance with ethical guidelines:
- Data Sourcing and Methodology:
We exclusively use data from government, customs, or government-affiliated websites to maintain reliability and public integrity. In addition, we engage directly with industry experts to gather real-time, firsthand information. Each data point is collected, verified, and aggregated following established ethical standards, ensuring that our research processes meet the rigor recommended by ESOMAR. - Transparency and Accuracy:
All data are published promptly as they become available from the source, ensuring that our insights remain current and reflective of on-ground market dynamics. We actively seek and incorporate regular feedback from industry experts, which allows us to make real-time adjustments and continuously improve the accuracy and reliability of our data. - Ethical Data Usage and Third-Party Material:
Our adherence to the ESOMAR Code of Conduct underscores our commitment to ethical research practices. We maintain strict controls over data sharing and usage; copying or distributing our data is prohibited under our company policy. Furthermore, all necessary agreements are in place for any third-party material used, ensuring full compliance with copyright laws and industry best practices. - Limitation of Liability:
While we strive to provide high-quality, timely market insights, the data is derived from a limited sample and should be interpreted within that context. We are not liable for any damages arising from the use of this data, as it is provided solely for informational purposes and as a directional indicator of market trends.
By integrating ESOMAR's ethical guidelines into our research methodology, we ensure that our practices are transparent, respectful of data confidentiality, and aligned with internationally recognized standards. This commitment not only reinforces the credibility of our insights but also builds trust with our stakeholders and industry partners.
Canadian government intervenes to end rail lockout
Posted on August 26, 2024 |
The Canadian government stepped in to end a shutdown of the country's two main freight railroads, ordering binding arbitration just 17 hours after it began.
The shutdown, caused by a lockout of union workers by Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Southern (CPKC), threatened to disrupt economies in both the U.S. and Canada.
Initially, the Prime Minister's administration hesitated to intervene, but the risk of disrupting key industries like agriculture, automobiles, energy, lumber, and chemicals led to quick action.
The Teamsters union, which represents about 9,000 workers at the two railroads, did not go on strike; the shutdown was initiated by a management lockout.
The government's decision to intervene is seen as a win for CN and CPKC, who were pushing for a resolution.
However, the union viewed this intervention as a setback, believing the dispute should have been resolved through direct negotiations.
This situation underscores the critical role of the railroads in the economy and the potential widespread impact of labor disputes if not swiftly addressed.
The binding arbitration ordered by the government is intended to resolve the labor dispute and prevent further economic harm to both Canada and the U.S.