At Centersource Technologies AB we are committed to the highest standards of ethical research and data integrity, guided by the ESOMAR Code of Conduct. Our data is sourced from a limited, anonymous market survey conducted with trusted and established industry participants. The insights derived from this survey reflect aggregated finalized prices as well as observed prices reported within the participants respective markets, with a focus on the highest prices recorded during the first two weeks of each month. These insights are provided for informational purposes only and are intended to indicate market trends rather than serve as comprehensive or fully representative market data.

In adherence to ESOMAR's principles, we ensure that all data collection and analysis are conducted with transparency, respect for confidentiality, and strict compliance with ethical guidelines:

  • Data Sourcing and Methodology:
    We exclusively use data from government, customs, or government-affiliated websites to maintain reliability and public integrity. In addition, we engage directly with industry experts to gather real-time, firsthand information. Each data point is collected, verified, and aggregated following established ethical standards, ensuring that our research processes meet the rigor recommended by ESOMAR.
  • Transparency and Accuracy:
    All data are published promptly as they become available from the source, ensuring that our insights remain current and reflective of on-ground market dynamics. We actively seek and incorporate regular feedback from industry experts, which allows us to make real-time adjustments and continuously improve the accuracy and reliability of our data.
  • Ethical Data Usage and Third-Party Material:
    Our adherence to the ESOMAR Code of Conduct underscores our commitment to ethical research practices. We maintain strict controls over data sharing and usage; copying or distributing our data is prohibited under our company policy. Furthermore, all necessary agreements are in place for any third-party material used, ensuring full compliance with copyright laws and industry best practices.
  • Limitation of Liability:
    While we strive to provide high-quality, timely market insights, the data is derived from a limited sample and should be interpreted within that context. We are not liable for any damages arising from the use of this data, as it is provided solely for informational purposes and as a directional indicator of market trends.

By integrating ESOMAR's ethical guidelines into our research methodology, we ensure that our practices are transparent, respectful of data confidentiality, and aligned with internationally recognized standards. This commitment not only reinforces the credibility of our insights but also builds trust with our stakeholders and industry partners.

Container line schedule reliability grew by 2.4% points in March, returning to pre-covid levels

Container line schedule reliability grew by 2.4% points in March, returning to pre-covid levels

Posted on May 12, 2023   |  

The global container line schedule reliability grew by 2.4% points in March to reach an average of 62.6%, following a surprising 7.7% points increase in reliability between January-February 2023. 

The schedule reliability improved by 26.8% points, and the average delay for late vessel arrivals is dropping.

March saw a month-on-month decline of 0.26 days, lowering the average delay to 5.03 days, which is slightly higher than compared to 2020 and significantly lower by 2.41 days when compared year-on-year.

13 of the top-14 carriers saw improvements in schedule reliability, with ZIM registering the biggest increase of 7.1% points.

Maersk was the top carrier with schedule reliability of 68.6%, followed by MSC with 67.7%.

5 more carriers saw rates above 60% and the rest carriers showcased reliability figures between 50% and 60%.

HMM saw a slight decline of 0.1% points, while Yang Ming had the least schedule reliability of 53.4%.