At Centersource Technologies AB we are committed to the highest standards of ethical research and data integrity, guided by the ESOMAR Code of Conduct. Our data is sourced from a limited, anonymous market survey conducted with trusted and established industry participants. The insights derived from this survey reflect aggregated finalized prices as well as observed prices reported within the participants respective markets, with a focus on the highest prices recorded during the first two weeks of each month. These insights are provided for informational purposes only and are intended to indicate market trends rather than serve as comprehensive or fully representative market data.

In adherence to ESOMAR's principles, we ensure that all data collection and analysis are conducted with transparency, respect for confidentiality, and strict compliance with ethical guidelines:

  • Data Sourcing and Methodology:
    We exclusively use data from government, customs, or government-affiliated websites to maintain reliability and public integrity. In addition, we engage directly with industry experts to gather real-time, firsthand information. Each data point is collected, verified, and aggregated following established ethical standards, ensuring that our research processes meet the rigor recommended by ESOMAR.
  • Transparency and Accuracy:
    All data are published promptly as they become available from the source, ensuring that our insights remain current and reflective of on-ground market dynamics. We actively seek and incorporate regular feedback from industry experts, which allows us to make real-time adjustments and continuously improve the accuracy and reliability of our data.
  • Ethical Data Usage and Third-Party Material:
    Our adherence to the ESOMAR Code of Conduct underscores our commitment to ethical research practices. We maintain strict controls over data sharing and usage; copying or distributing our data is prohibited under our company policy. Furthermore, all necessary agreements are in place for any third-party material used, ensuring full compliance with copyright laws and industry best practices.
  • Limitation of Liability:
    While we strive to provide high-quality, timely market insights, the data is derived from a limited sample and should be interpreted within that context. We are not liable for any damages arising from the use of this data, as it is provided solely for informational purposes and as a directional indicator of market trends.

By integrating ESOMAR's ethical guidelines into our research methodology, we ensure that our practices are transparent, respectful of data confidentiality, and aligned with internationally recognized standards. This commitment not only reinforces the credibility of our insights but also builds trust with our stakeholders and industry partners.

SC Ports to cut vessel queues with new operational solutions

SC Ports to cut vessel queues with new operational solutions

Posted on July 5, 2024   |  

South Carolina Ports (SC Ports) is reducing vessel queues by implementing operational solutions and temporarily pausing toe wall construction for ocean carriers and cargo owners.

These solutions have already decreased wait times and reduced the number of ships waiting.

The port has been dealing with a ship backlog due to a software issue in May and berth impacts at Wando Welch Terminal from toe wall construction.

Starting July 3, SC Ports will pause toe wall construction at Wando Welch Terminal to reopen all three berths until July 14, speeding up ship processing and clearing the remaining anchorage.

SC Ports aims to work ships on arrival by mid-July, and as the wall construction resumes in August, a 48-hour average wait is expected.

By late fall, the port expects to handle three ships simultaneously at Wando Welch Terminal, with the project slated for completion in March 2025, and the Leatherman Terminal reopening to add another berth.

Toe wall construction, which began in March 2024, involves installing steel sheets in sections, initially accommodating three ships but later reducing to two berths, causing longer wait times.